To: Dutchess County Conservative Party Chairman Patricia Killian

               This is a request for an interview from the Conservative Party.

 As I have previously requested from Dutchess County Chairman Patricia Killian, I would like to answer any questions the Committee has in reference to my Conservative Voting Record. I see a Majority of my voting to fall within the guidelines of our Conservative Parties Platform and have done so for the past 3 ½ years.

                          Office Sought: Dutchess County Legislator District 1

Name: Mr. James R. Doxsey

Age: 56

Party: Conservative Party Since 1985

Ballot Line seeking: Conservative

Owner /Operator of Doxsey Auto Inc. Since 1971

Occupation: Automotive Technician Specialist

Education: Graduate Arlington High, 2Years Technical School, 6 Months GM technical Training/ Tarrytown, N.Y.

Experience: 40 years in Independant Businessman Ownership: Certified in Automotive Engines, Transmissions, Transaxles, Differentials, Vice President Sports Museum of Dutchess County, Board member Anderson School of Autism Fundraising Committee, Co – Chairman Dreams of Gold Foundation. United States Figure Skating Trial Judge, 2 Years Vice Chairman Public Safety Committee, 2 Years Public Safety Committee, 4 Years Public Works and Capitol Projects Committee, 4 Years Wireless Committee, Member of the Voter Integrity Task Force, 2 Years of the New York State Association of Counties (NYSAC) Intergovernmental Affairs and General Government Relations Committee Member, 2 Years (NYSAC) Public Safety Committee Member. 

                     Some of the biggest challenges my Town and County face: 

  Heavily burdened Fire Taxes, Overpopulation at local jail and Loss of property on the tax rolls. Affordable Senior Housing and prescription costs for seniors. Heavily congested highways and intersections during business hours.  

                        How I will and am addressing those challenges:  

  Bear pressure to town Board members to FIX the un-fair tax inequities of Dist. 1 fire tax which Encompasses both Arlington and Fairview Fire Districts, Bring to State Legislation answers to fore-mentioned problem, as I have been doing in Albany for a multitude of years now. Put into action answers toward ways of paying for the modification of the jail with-out additional cost to the County Taxpayers. Put into place corrective measures to not continue to lose properties to not for profit agencies for our properties in District 1. Produce Real answers to Senior housing problems and cost of living in Dutchess County for the elderly. Maintain an open relationship with State and County Officals to address the roads and highway congestion.

                               Why do I want to be Re- elected?

  56 years in Dutchess County, I have seen assets and many failures.

Time is now to continue to bring to the people of the County, Real answers to the Public and solutions as they truly deserve. Real Legislation so our Seniors and our Children can remain safe and continue to live here!

 Please respond via mail, phone or e-mail at:  JRCDOXSEY@AOL.COM

                                                          Respectfully Submitted,

                                                           Mr. James R. Doxsey

                                                           Dutchess County Legislator District 1

                                                           55 Buckingham Avenue

                                                           Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

                                  Cell (845) 337-0026 Home (845) 454-5225 Work (845) 229-1816

 

Doxsey in Albany, Again

We Lobbied May 17, 2011 for adequate Public Safety Protection in the District 1 area.  Only a small few were receptive, most were worried to respond to this difficult topic.

 I want to thank some for the appreciation that was expressed to me :

  Our resident Virginia Buechele Writes: ” Thanks for representing the taxpayers today in Albany Jim – with you there we knew we need not be – you represent us – we were in good hands. – I think that is what representive government is supposed to be about “!

  ” Thanks ” says it all, keeps me going and allows me to push even harder to help the residents as they most surely deserve representation.

 

 Seems to me the Voters Spoke VERY Clearly in 2010 – No More Growing Local Government!!!

This is precisely why I VOTED ” NO ” to GROWING THIS COMMISSIONER OF SOLID WASTE POSITION ( Now 3 Total ) and over-see the RESOURCE COVERY AGENCY. Appears to me Costs are going to be placed on EVERY Resident. It doesn’t address the ones whom don’t pay taxes: Hospitals, Schools or Colleges. They will be VERY LARGE Generators of garbage, what about those? Who will pay for their garbage pick-up. Correct, You and Me. 

Dutchess County Executive Steinhaus Writes :  ” It will be intriguing to watch if the 2011 County Legislature ( the now Republican majority and many new first term legislators were sent to govern the county based on a promise of smaller government) now reverses itself and adopts an intrusive, big government program that over-regulates, and gobbles up the private sector at the same time “.

 Doxsey Writes: Wonders Never Cease to Amaze Me, Voters were led to the water after PROMISES of Smaller Government. Sadly this is not the case with the Current Super Majority of Republican Legislators. Every One of them Voted in Favor of ENLARGING Local Government. Say one thing and do something else- Sad Indeed.

 

A772-2009 Actions

  • Jul 1, 2010: HELD FOR CONSIDERATION IN WAYS AND MEANS
  • Jan 26, 2010: REPORTED REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS
  • Jan 6, 2010: REFERRED TO REAL PROPERTY TAXATION
  • Feb 24, 2009: REPORTED REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS
  • Jan 7, 2009: REFERRED TO REAL PROPERTY TAXATION

A772-2009 Text

 S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 
                                           772
 2009-2010 Regular Sessions
 I N  ASSEMBLY
 (PREFILED)
 January 7, 2009
 
 Introduced by M. of A. GUNTHER, GALEF, CARROZZA -- Multi-Sponsored by -
 M.  of A. BOYLAND, CALHOUN, CROUCH, MILLER, MOLINARO, SAYWARD, SCOZZA
 FAVA, THIELE -- read once and referred to the Committee on Real  Prop
 erty Taxation
 AN  ACT  to  amend the real property tax law, in relation to authorizing
 fire districts to impose special ad valorem levies and special assess
 ments against otherwise tax exempt real property
 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 

Section  1. 

Section  490  of the real property tax law, as amended by
 chapter 87 of the laws of 2001, is amended to read as follows:
 

S 490. Exemption from special ad valorem levies  and  special  assess
 ments.    Real property exempt from taxation pursuant to subdivision two
 of section four hundred, subdivision one of section four  hundred  four,
 subdivision  one  of  section  four  hundred  six, sections four hundred
 eight, four hundred ten, four hundred ten-a, four  hundred  ten-b,  four
 hundred  eighteen,  four  hundred  twenty-a, four hundred twenty-b, four
 hundred twenty-two, four hundred twenty-six, four hundred  twenty-seven,
 four hundred twenty-eight, four hundred thirty, four hundred thirty-two,
 four  hundred thirty-four, four hundred thirty-six, four hundred thirty
 eight, four hundred fifty, four hundred fifty-two, four  hundred  fifty
 four,  four  hundred  fifty-six,  four  hundred sixty-four, four hundred
 seventy-two, four hundred seventy-four and four hundred  eighty-five  of
 this  chapter  shall  also  be exempt from special ad valorem levies and
 special assessments against real property  located  outside  cities  and
 villages  for  a  special  improvement  or service or a special district
 improvement or service and special ad valorem levies and special assess
 ments imposed by a county improvement district or  district  corporation
 except  (1)  those  levied  to pay for the costs, including interest and
 incidental and preliminary  costs,  of  the  acquisition,  installation,
 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
 [ ] is old law to be omitted.
 LBD00106-01-9
        A. 772                              2
 construction,  reconstruction  and  enlargement  of  or additions to the
 following  improvements,  including  original  equipment,   furnishings,
 machinery  or  apparatus, and the replacements thereof: water supply and
 distribution systems; sewer systems (either sanitary or surface drainage
 or  both, including purification, treatment or disposal plants or build
 ings); waterways and drainage improvements; street,  highway,  road  and
 parkway  improvements  (including  sidewalks,  curbs, gutters, drainage,
 landscaping, grading or improving the right of way)  [and]  (2)  special
 assessments  payable in installments on an indebtedness including inter
 est contracted prior to July first, nineteen hundred fifty-three, pursu
 ant to section two hundred forty-two of the town law or pursuant to  any
 other  comparable provision of law AND (3) SPECIAL AD VALOREM LEVIES AND
 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR A SPECIAL DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT OR SERVICE LEVIED
 BY A FIRE DISTRICT, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT  OR  A  PROPERTY  RECEIVING
 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES.
 

S 2. This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to special
 ad  valorem  levies  and  special  assessments  imposed on or after such
 effective date.
 

Those whom choose to tell their constituents ” We’ll Cut Taxes in 2010 and 2011″,  were outright lied to. This TAX was supposed to “SUNSET”, meaning cease to exist on November 2011.  This was another perfect time to HELP the people they REPRESENT get some Tax Relief. This is the 3rd time DC Legislators have placed revenue in the budget that relies on raising more or extending existing Taxes. Now NO Relief will be realized until 2013? Below is the article from the Poughkeepsie Journal Writer Larry Hertz from his online version. Sadly not an ounce of Ink was used to Print it in Todays Poughkeepsie Journal.

Dutchess legislators approve another sales tax surcharge extension
POUGHKEEPSIE – It’s a biennial debate, and it usually breaks out along party lines.  The Dutchess County Legislature, after some noisy debate, approved a home rule request asking the state legislature to authorize continuation of the three-quarter percent sales tax surcharge collected by the county, on top of the four percent normal state and three percent county sales taxes.

Democrat Joel Tyner, labeling the sales tax ‘regressive’, made his usual pitch for what he called a more ‘progressive’ income tax.  Conservative James Doxsey, who usually caucuses with the Democrats, suggested this amounts to an increase in the level of taxation.

“A lot of the residents were led to believe that this legislative body was going to cut taxes.  Again, you’re going to be raising more revenue from the people, revenue that the people don’t have,” he said.

Republican Michael Kelsey noted this is just a continuation of a tax that has been in place for some time.

“This is not a new tax, a new sales tax.  This is an extension of the level of sales tax that it was.  Sales tax which, as other legislators pointed out was needed to balance our budget, keep that level; sales tax that, something that somebody can choose not to buy an item,” he said.

Other Republicans challenged Democrats to identify revenues that would replace the $26 million that would be lost if the state legislature does not approve another two-year extension, through November 2013.  There was no response. 

The legislature approved the request on mostly a party-line 18-5-1 vote, the single vote coming from Legislator Doxsey.

 “Revenue is easy to gain. My re-introduction again of the Repeal to the Amendment of the Stock Transfer Tax makes up for the State of New Yorks 12 BILLION Dollar Defecit. One swipe of the pen is all it takes to FIX New Yorks Financial Issues”.

 Call your Senators, Congressman, Assemblyman and Local Legislators to put an end to our Defecit. See my Repeal of the Amendment at:  DOXSEY1.COM.   

 

COMPTROLLER Vs. BUDGET DIRECTOR

Dutchess budget director locks horns with county comptroller  
POUGHKEEPSIE – Dutchess County Budget Director Valerie Sommerville criticized County Comptroller James Coughlan over a memo he drafted to county legislative leadership about county finances.

In a memo to lawmakers, Friday , Sommerville said Coughlan’s comments and interpretation of the county’s budgetary matters are “misleading and inaccurate.”  She criticized his remarks about available county revenue, fund balance and uncaptured revenues.

“Sadly, his eagerness to blast his findings to the media without taking the time to validate his assumptions to be certain he was reporting a complete and accurate fiscal picture makes it alarmingly clear he is more interested in promoting himself than actually helping county government operate more efficiently,” Sommerville wrote.

  Jim Doxsey Writes: So, this writer asks simple questions:  Who do we believe when such Multiples of Millions of Your County taxpayer Dollars are at stake?

 Surely Previous Comptrollers can’t ALL be wrong is making similiar statements.